EU's Pursuit for Strategic Autonomy in Space: Challenges and Opportunities
The EU is setting its sights on space, not just as a domain for scientific discovery but as a way to increase economic resilience and security. In a world where space technology is used for everything from navigation and communications to defense and environmental monitoring, relying on non-European providers is no longer a viable option for the EU, as it has highlighted in recent strategies.
At the same time, developing independent capabilities in an increasingly contested space comes with significant costs, such as investment in technology and talent. It could be argued that relying on existing foreign technology is more cost-effective in the short term, which raises the question if the EU’s pursuit of space autonomy is worth the substantial investment it requires?
Civilian Space Autonomy
Strategic autonomy in space means having the ability to launch satellites and other assets without relying on external providers. Currently, the EU depends heavily on SpaceX and other non-European companies for launching missions. The EU must address such dependencies by accelerating the development of sovereign satellite constellations, like IRIS², which aims to provide secure connectivity across Europe.
Sectors like precision agriculture, maritime navigation, and border security are increasingly reliant on satellite technology. Disruptions in space infrastructure could severely impact supply chains, transportation networks, and critical industries across Europe. EU leaders, including Commissioner Thierry Breton at the 14th European Space Conference, have emphasised that Europe’s credibility as a space power depends on its ability to launch independently. However, developing competitive and cost-effective launchers is a significant challenge, especially as private sector companies such as SpaceX and Blue Origin continue to push technological boundaries with reusable rockets. The reality is that the EU needs to innovate fast if it wants to secure a meaningful position in the global space race.
Additionally, rapid space advancements by China and India raise concerns about the EU falling behind. Without autonomous capabilities, Europe risks technological and security vulnerabilities that could leave it dependent on unpredictable geopolitical partners.
Defence Space Autonomy
The EU has long been cautious about explicitly linking space with military activities, preferring to emphasise civilian and scientific uses. However, recent geopolitical tensions, particularly after the war in Ukraine, have shown the strategic importance of space-based assets for security and defense. For instance, the reliance on Starlink during the Ukraine war has shown Europe’s vulnerabilities in space-based communications. Satellites provide critical services such as secure communications and intelligence gathering: capabilities that have proven indispensable in modern conflicts.
Recognising this, the EU’s 2023 Space Strategy explicitly acknowledges the “dual-use” nature of space assets, like satellites, that can serve both civilian and military purposes. Beyond defense, space technology has for long been used for civilian purposes. The strategy also calls for increased cooperation with NATO and the US - an ironic twist for a policy focused on autonomy.
However, there’s a fine line between ensuring security and militarising the space assets that are at the disposal of the EU. The EU must balance its goal of securing space assets with its commitment to keeping space a peaceful domain. Moreover, defence policy remains largely a national competence, making it tricky for Brussels to coordinate a unified approach.
The Challenges of Becoming a Space Power
With that said, autonomy in the civilian and military domain is important, however achieving strategic autonomy in space is easier said than done. The EU faces several obstacles:
Fragmentation: Space policy is split between the EU, the European Space Agency, and national governments, making coordination quite difficult.This fragmentation extends to the regulatory environment, where efforts to establish a unified European Space Law must navigate complex treaty limitations and balance harmonization with respect for national space industries.
Funding: Space is expensive, and despite ambitious plans, European budgets are small compared to other space powers like the US.
Competition: Private companies are moving faster than governments, raising the question of whether the EU should step aside and let industry take the lead.
Geopolitical Dependence: While autonomy is the goal, Europe must maintain strategic partnerships, particularly with the US, to ensure access to advanced space capabilities.
The EU needs to address these challenges decisively if it wants to establish itself as a true space power.
Conclusion: A Mission Worth Pursuing
So, is the pursuit of space autonomy truly worth the substantial investment it requires? The answer is yes. The EU’s drive for strategic autonomy in space is not just about prestige, but about securing economic stability and technological leadership in a highly competitive domain.
However, the EU needs to move faster and be more agile. If it can streamline its regulatory approach, invest wisely in launch capabilities, and strike the right balance between cooperation and independence, it has a real possibility of becoming a space power in its own right.
Otherwise, Europe risks being stuck in orbit: forever chasing, but never quite catching up to, the space giants of the world.
Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not constitute the official position of The Brussels Effect, which maintains its commitment as a non-partisan, independent blog
 | A guest post by
|